Quality of Clinical Notes: Lesson Learned from Elective Surgery Patients Admitted at University Teaching Hospital

  • Jay N Shah Department of Surgery, Patan Hospital, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.
  • Shantbir Maharjan Department of Surgery, Patan Hospital, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal.
  • Shailendra Shah Department of Surgery, Patan Hospital, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Lalitpur, Nepal

Abstract

Background: Informative relevant documentation regarding course of treatment minimizes errors, provides data for evidence based practice and legality. However, the clinical notes are often inadequate. This study aims to analyse quality of structured clinical notes in surgical patients.
Methods: This cross sectional study from Oct 1, 2015 in department of surgery included 100 clinical notes randomly selected by lottery. The entries in notes were predefined. There were 29 general entries (nine for identification, eleven for admission details, eight for treatment progress, and one for handwriting). Three additional entries were for discharge patients. The decision for entries was based on consensus meeting in surgery department. Microsoft excel was used for data entry and descriptive analysis.
Results: There were 100 clinical notes analysed, 62 non-discharge and 38 discharge patients. Four (out of 62) non-discharge had all 29 entries documented. Two (out of 38) in discharge had all 32 entries documented. The “date of entries, clinician name and designation†were mentioned in 12%, 13% and 10%, respectively. The progress on diet was recorded in 53%, investigations in 72% and intervention details in 73%. Handwriting was difficult to read in 21%. In 13 (out of 100) the identification information was incomplete. Discharge lacked details of home advice in 11%.
Conclusions: The quality of clinical note of elective surgery patients needs improvement on documentation in all domains of identification, admission, progress and discharge.
Keywords: Admission discharge information; elective surgery; quality of clinical notes; tertiary care teaching hospital.

References

REFERENCES

Mann R, Williams J.Standards in medical record keeping. Clin Med. 2003;3(4):329-32.

M. Y. Ho, A. R. Anderson, A. Nijjar, C. Thomas, A. Goenka, J. Hossain, and P. J. Curley. Use of the CRABEL Score for improving surgical case-note quality. Ann R CollSurg Engl. 2005 Nov; 87(6): 454–7. doi: 10.1308/003588405X60687

Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Spreeuwenberg P, Wagner C, Groenewegen PP, vanderWal G. Quality of patient record keeping: an indicator of the quality of care? BMJ QualSaf. 2011;20(4):314-8.

Commission A. Improving data quality in the NHS. Executive Summary. Health 2010. http://socialwelfare.bl.uk/subject-areas/services-activity/health-services/auditcommission/13580926082010pbrnhsdataqualityexesummary.pdf

NCEPOD. Emergency admissions: a journey in the right direction? [07/04/2014]. 2007. Available from:, http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2007report1/

Downloads/EA_report.pdf

Lilford RJ, Mohammed MA, Braunholtz D, Hofer TP. The measurement of active errors: methodological issues. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(Suppl. 2).ii8e12.

Shah IN, Maharjan SB, Manandhar K, Paudyal S, Shrestha S, Shah S, Lamichane D. Early Feeding and Discontinuation of Intravenous Fluid After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. JNHRC J Nepal Health Res Counc.2012 Jan;10(20):28-31.

J.N. Shah, SB Maharjan, S Paudyal. Routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in low-risk laparoscopic cholecystectomy is unnecessary: a randomized clinical trial. Asian J Surg. 2012;35:136-9.

Lyons JM, Martinez JA, O'Leary JP. Medical malpractice matters: medical record M & Ms. J SurgEduc. 2009;66(2):113e7.

Shah JN, Pokhrel Y, Hassan K, Thapa G, ManandharK,Maharjan SB. Is routine hospital visit after day case inguinal hernia surgery in children necessary? J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2013 Jan;11(23):35-9.

Ministry of Health and Medical Education of Iran MOHME: Quality of Medical Records. 2000. Document 620

Jasmine Ehsanullah, Umar Ahmad, KohmalSolanki, Justin Healy, NaimKadoglou. The surgical admissions proforma: Does it make a difference?Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2015; 4:53-7.

Ho MY, Anderson AR, Nijjar A, Thomas C, Goenka A, Hossain J, et al. Use of the CRABEL score for improving surgical case-note quality. Ann R CollSurg Engl. 2005;87(6):454-7.

14. Faraj AA, Brewer OD, Afinowi R. The value of an admissions proforma for elderly patients with trauma. Injury. 2011;42(2):171-2.

Diver AJ, Craig BF. Admission proforma significantly improves the medical record. Scott Med J. 2005;50(3):101-2.

O'Driscoll BR, Al-Nuaimi D. Medical admission records can be improved by the use of a structured proforma. Clin Med. 2003;3(4):385-6.

Published
2017-09-08
How to Cite
ShahJ. N., MaharjanS., & ShahS. (2017). Quality of Clinical Notes: Lesson Learned from Elective Surgery Patients Admitted at University Teaching Hospital. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council, 15(2), 100-104. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v15i2.916