Transabdominal Pre-peritoneal Mesh Repair versus Lichtensteinâ€™s Hernioplasty
Background: In the era of minimal invasive surgery, hernia repair has seen a paradigm shift from open to laparoscopic technique. However, superiority of laparoscopic repair over open repair is still controversial. Available literatures have shown laparoscopic technique to be better in term of post-operative pain and early return to work.
Methods: In this prospective study, a total of 102 patients aged 21-78 years with inguinal hernia were recruited and enrolled into two comparative groups, namely Lichtensteinâ€™s and Transabdominal pre-peritoneal, and each group containing 51 participants. Hospital ethical committee approval and written informed consent from patients was obtained. Primarily, the duration of operation, post-operative pain and complication, and quality of life after surgery was compared between the two different approaches of hernia repair.
Results: The study results demonstrated a statistically significant superiority of trans abdominal pre-peritoneal repair over Lichtensteinâ€™s hernioplasty in terms of post operative pain (2.00Â±0.63 vs 3.90Â±0.74 VAS score, P value<0.001), hospital stay (2.33Â±0.62 vs 2.96Â±0.20 days, P value <0.001) and quality of life with early return to normal work (13.39Â±0.60 vs 17.88Â±0.86 days, P value <0.001); whereas a prolonged operative time was seen in transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair (96.08Â±27.08 vs 42.55Â±5.95 mins, P value <0.001).
Conclusions: This study has shown that transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair is better than Lichtensteinâ€™s in respect to post-operative pain, quality of life and post-operative complication. However, it has prolonged operative duration than conventional method.
Keywords: Hernioplasty, inguinal hernia, Lichtensteinâ€™s repair, TAPP: Transabdominal pre-peritoneal procedure.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Journal of Nepal Health Research Council JNHRC allows to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The author(s) are allowed to retain publishing rights without restrictions. The JNHRC work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.